“All-of-the-above” – Obama, 4/17/12

——————————————————————————————————————————–
(Note: 3nd in a series on Obama energy policy
<=== Previous || Next ===>

——————————————————————————————————————————–

In a Rose Garden speech Tuesday, President Obama describes his energy policy as an “all-of-the-above” strategy. He was flanked by Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Justice Department Secretary Eric Holder.

The policy has two flaws:

  1. It isn’t “all-of-the-above”
  2. Fracking messes up Obama’s long-term strategy

Every Presidential action, including Tuesday’s remarks and last Friday’s energy executive order, follows a master plan outlined back on March 30th, 2011. It is called, “Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future“.

Everything you ever wanted to know about President Obama’s energy policy is spelled out in the blueprint.

In this article, the blueprint is reviewed in terms of Obama’s current campaign trail claims that his energy policy is an “all-of-the-above” strategy that develops EVERY U.S. energy resource. Fracking will be examined separately in later detailed articles.

President Obama on Energy Policy

In the blueprint, the President rightly looks ahead to a future time when non-renewable fossil fuel resources are gone. He is to be commended for that.

Funding energy conservation and investing in alternative energy today in preparation for tomorrow is smart policy.

When introduced a year ago, President Obama made these remarks about the blueprint:

I talked about reducing America’s dependence on oil when I was running for President, and I’m proud of the historic progress that we’ve made over the last two years towards that goal

Today, I want to announce a new goal, one that is reasonable, one that is achievable, and one that is necessary. When I was elected to this office, America imported 11 million barrels of oil a day.  By a little more than a decade from now, we will have cut that by one-third.
– President Obama, America’s Energy Security, 3/30,2011

The United States of America cannot afford to bet our long-term prosperity and security on a resource that will eventually run out. Not anymore.
– President Obama, Blueprint for a Secure Energy Future, 3/30/2011

The General Strategy

The blueprint outlines a three-prong energy strategy:

  • Develop and Secure America’s Energy Supplies
  • Provide Consumers With Choices to Reduce Costs and Save Energy
  • Innovate our Way to a Clean Energy Future

“Develop and Secure America’s  energy supplies ” is the leg of the energy policy tripod that speaks most directly to whether or not the Obama Administration policy is an “all-of-the-above” strategy or not. Its 6 pages long.

In the other two sections, 29 pages, it defines how conservation and innovation will develop renewable, eco-friendly and greenhouse gas reducing energy alternatives that America will love.

Forecasting the Future

Taken from the blueprint, the above graphics show the current energy situation in several sectors and projects future energy growth.

For example, by 2030, batteries for electric cars are forecast to cost 1/10th their current price and the cost per kilowatt of solar energy will drop to 1/5th.

Combined, renewable sources are forecast to grow by 140% in just four years from 2008 to 2012!

The Future of Oil, Coal and Natural Gas

Understandably, in the wake of the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill, the blueprint emphasizes the safe development of oil and natural gas resources. The section on it is titled, “Expand Safe and Responsible Domestic Oil and Natural Gas Development and Production”.

For all fossil fuels the blueprint sets environmentalism, worker safety and CO2 emissions (global warming) as its primary targets.

The Obama blueprint calls for more regulatory oversight and controls through these newly created agencies:

  1. Office of Natural Resources Revenue (ONRR)
  2. Bureau of Ocean Energy Managment (BOEM)
  3. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE)

ONRR’s purpose is “ensure the full and fair return to the American people of federal and Indian royalties and other monies owed for the utilization of public resources”. Mostly it collects leasing royalties.

BOEM “conducts and oversees world-class research and environmental reviews to support decision-making regarding offshore conventional and renewable energy development.” BOEM further touts that “BOEM is leading the nation toward a renewable energy future.”

This is the agency that oversees offshore energy development such as deep water drilling.

BSEE “works to promote safety, protect the environment, and conserve resources offshore through vigorous regulatory oversight and enforcement.”

Coal

According to the EIA, coal represents about 24% of total energy use in the United States. It is projected to remain near that level through 2035.

The only mention of it in the blueprint is R&D investment into clean coal technologies to curb global warming. $3.5 billion in ARRA funds went to global warming friendly CO2 emission recovery and storage for coal.

Energy Goals

Unlike all non-fossil fuel energy sources, the blueprint does NOT set production goals for oil, natural gas or coal!

The U.S. has vast reserves of undeveloped coal. Through the new technology of fracking there are vast recoverable reserves of both petroleum and natural gas that could be developed.

In fact, through fracking, those reserves are being developed on private and state lands right now today. It is why U.S. oil and gas production is increasing. Public land development of these resources is in decline.

Conclusions

According to the EIA, 82% of total U.S. energy came from oil, natural gas and coal in 2008. The EIA projects that percentage to remain the same through 2035 with a small amount coming from renewable biodiesel.

Fossil fuels will supply most of this country’s energy for many decades to come… even without fracking.

Fossil fuel environmental and worker safety concerns are of paramount importance. It is well covered in the blueprint. The Deepwater Horizon taught us that lesson.

The problem with the blueprint is that is all it ever covers.

When your nation’s long-term energy plan imposes restrictions on but does not set production goals for 82% of your nation’s total projected energy use over the next 23 years then something is seriously wrong.

Note that in the President’s remarks he emphasizes “reducing America’s dependence on oil” over “reducing America’s dependence on foreign oil”.

There is a subtle distinction.

There can be only one logical conclusion… Obama’s energy policy is not an “all-of-the-above” strategy.

Advertisements

About azleader

Learning to see life more clearly... one image at a time!

Posted on Apr 19, 2012, in 2012 Elections, Barack Obama, climate change, culture, economics, Global Warming, news, Opinion, Politics, science. Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. I think that Obama’s use of the phrase ‘all of the above’ is amusing. Anything can quality for all of the above, it all depends upon what is listed above. 🙂 Since Obama’s energy plan is broadly aimed at developing a green energy sector, it is logical that oil and coal are not listed as answers, because they do not achieve that goal. P.S. some test taking advice from a teacher: all of the above is usually the right answer.

    • You are right, of course. However, it is sad more than amusing that President Obama is serious.

      I’m not a certified teacher but worked closely with many over the years. I learned much from them.

  2. The President must have misspoke. He ment all above ground sources of energy.

  3. I actually cannot figure out this administrations energy policy. I think it leans heavily green. But then, last week Friday he issued some Executive Order meant to help streamline fracking. Then the EPA this week released some guidelines on the chemicals and fluids that could be used for fracking. But then the administration set them aside until 2015, which means that fracking is basically unregulated with respect to watershed protection. To him all of the above, means he can say he is for everything but against everything simulatneously so that he can say he was on the correct side of any argument. He wants it all ways. But fracking is going full steam ahead.

  4. Ahhhh… are you SURE that is what the executive order was about??

    Stay tuned, I’m just getting warmed up on this subject. In the meantime read the order itself and decide for yourself:
    http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/04/13/executive-order-supporting-safe-and-responsible-development-unconvention

    The order itself is only the tip of the iceberg… the other thing that happened that day is more meaningful.

    • Looking forward to the coming articles because from what I read in the main stream media and on tv this guy is for everything supposedly and protecting the environment and lowering prices for energy but also combating climate change with technologies that would raise prices. If you can see through all the smoke, I am all ears. I still sense that political opportunism is at play as in my original comment.

  1. Pingback: Executive Order on Domestic Energy « Inform The Pundits!

  2. Pingback: President Obama on Oil and Gas « Inform The Pundits!

Comments and questions are welcomed!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: