Don’t Fall Off the Fiscal Cliff

The current impasse between Democrats and Republicans over the fiscal cliff is nothing new. It has deep roots going back many decades. Democrats and Republicans have fundamentally incompatible economic philosophies. That is what must be overcome today.

Economics has been at the heart of their animosity for 80 years.

There has been a lot of movement with the fiscal cliff in the last few days, but no progress.

However, it can be fixed!

In the Beginning…

https://i1.wp.com/www.pbase.com/azleader/image/147680138.jpg

John Maynard Keynes

FDR, a Democrat, embraced the ideas of economist John Maynard Keynes in the early 1930s.

Keynes is the father of modern economics. Back then, desperate times called for desperate measures.

The ravages of the Great Depression were everywhere. Something had to be done. Keynes offered a radically new approach to economics that was worth a try.

Before the 1930s, liberals were much like conservatives. They believed in less government, lower taxes, capitalism and staunch fiscal responsibility. Perhaps that is why pseudo-intellectual Democrats today prefer to be called progressives instead of liberals, to depart from their former selves.

If Herbert Hoover had been a Democrat and FDR a Republican then the roles of the two parties would be reversed today.

Government Spending

At the heart of Keynes new ideas is government spending. He says that only governments have sufficient resources to overcome an under-performing national economy and nurse it back to health.

FDR applied Keynes ideas on a massive scale. He created huge jobs programs funded through deficit spending and incorporated other Keynesian ideas into every aspect of the New Deal. From it came Social Security, unemployment benefits and tight banking regulations.

U.S. government economic policy has mostly been dominated by Keynes ever since. Republicans have remained opposed to large centralized government spending programs, in favor of lower taxes and committed to fiscal responsibility. Those are the antithesis of Keynesian macroeconomics when an economy is under duress.

The Reality of Debt

Keynesianism works for a government if:

  • It isn’t already overburdened with excessive debt
  • It has a balanced budget within 19% of GDP to start with
  • It pays off acquired debt during prosperous times

In today’s economy, the United States has scored a big fat zero on all three counts. Because of that, we are being squeezed from all sides.

The only possible solution to the current dilemma is for Democrats and Republicans to bring the best of their economic philosophies together and forge a reasonable compromise.

The Danger

The greatest danger isn’t the cliff itself.

As partisans of both parties already know, they could go over the cliff short-term to score political points and then resolve the cliff in January… or February… or later without serious fiscal damage.

But the real damage comes with the perception of creditors. Those folks lend the U.S. federal government $3.2 billion dollars every day to fund massive debt growth. When they lose confidence they will stop loaning money and the cost of borrowing will spiral until recovery becomes impossible. The investor damage will be done if we only briefly go over the edge.

The United States has exploding debt growth. Trillion dollar deficits have become the norm, not the exception. Continue as we are and the United States will necessarily default and life as-we-know-it for our children and grandchildren will decline.

With continuing excessive debt, the United States, as a world economic superpower, will inevitably fade, much like we see economies in Europe fading before our very eyes today. It is already forecast that China will replace the U.S. at the world’s biggest economy by our next presidential elections.

On the other hand, we cannot allow an under-performing economy to continue to stagnate. That, too, is certain economic death. The government must apply Keynesian principles to help increase demand and recover the economy. As every good entrepreneur already knows, you have to spend money to make money. Keynesianism is capitalism applied at the governmental level.

Conclusions

So what to do?

Through our own folly, taxes have to be raised, at least temporarily, to reduce recovery time. But most important of all, because national sovereign debt is approaching 75% of GDP, spending MUST be cut… and much more than taxes are raised!

In year #1, and every year after, there needs to be about three times more in yearly cuts than tax increases. That is not what either party is proposing.

Republicans and Democrats must come together. Both must give. Both must compromise if the nation is to avoid decline.

Advertisements

About azleader

Learning to see life more clearly... one image at a time!

Posted on Dec 3, 2012, in culture, Debt, Debt crisis, economics, Life, National Debt, news, Opinion, Politics, Thoughts. Bookmark the permalink. 4 Comments.

  1. They ain’t gping to do it, are they, AZ? Finding anything the looks even remotely like leadership in this xountry appears an impossible task.

    • Methinks… nope… not a chance.

      If anything, both sides appear to be digging in their heels. Obama has already flat out rejected the Republican counteroffer.

      We will see where they go from here.

      • I think the Democrats want to go over the cliff because then they win on tax rate hikes, and all the negotiating will be on who gets the tax cuts and which programs get spared. Today’s web has articles saying the publlc will blame the Republicans. If true, Obama will play his hand taking us over the cliff.

  2. Republicans and Democrats have cut taxes or increased government spending in every recession just as Keynes would have since FDR The two parties get truly reckless in the macroeconomic area when the recovery begins, however, and the cutting of spending or tax increases which is supposed to happen according to Keynes theories never occurs, hence the big mess we are in. Your solution means slow growth for a few more years, and we have no real choice.

    You make an interesting point about Democrats calling themselves Progressives and not Liberals–never understood why. So progressives harken back to more fiscal sanity I take it. I have to think on that one. Here in Madison some of the “progressives” make old fashioned Harry Truman type liberals look like right wingers.

Comments and questions are welcomed!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: